Jesus Freak will Never Go Away

in christian music, DC Talk, Jesus Freak, Newsboys

I first heard Jesus Freak from DC Talk in 1995. I picked up the single almost a year before the actual album came out. It was giant step forward for Christian Music.

It also became that song that was overplayed. A few years later the Jesus Freak record was being played at every church youth function, youth camp, gathering, campfire, and mission trip. I began to hate the song and got angry at DC Talk for taking so long between records.

Now the Newsboys have been together longer than DC Talk; both band hail from the late 80s. Newsboys, like DC Talk have a long repertoire of catchy and overplayed songs. So of course when Michael Tait of DC talk becomes the new singer for Newsboys we get CCM incest with an up to date cover of Jesus Freak.

At least its not Petra.

When everyone is invited

in comic, dinner, inclusivity

Sometimes you try; you really try to include people, show them some love, and hope they can be cool.

Sometimes it never happens.

Why is it always at crack house?

in comic, humor, preaching

Why is it assumed from some groups that missing a Sunday morning will automatically send your child to a crack house?

Maybe they go to college, get a job, and simply don't believe the way their parents believe.

Maybe we expect the worst out of people. Maybe that fear can encourage better attendance.

How many of people who say things like this have any interaction with people from a crack house or anyone else in these kinds of destructive situations?

16 Jun

The Wrong Question


I used to applaud myself on how open I was. I loved the odd, strange, and social outcasts. Perhaps I was identifying with people like myself, but I thought I was some sort of evolved Christian with special prophetic insights.

Maybe I was; because I knew something still wasn't right with this gospel message ministry church thing. It wasn't working for me or anyone else who was being honest.

It is funny what you see when you look backwards in time. What I thought was inclusive, loving, and helpful was probably closer to exclusive, arrogant, and absent.

Sure, I was inclusive of some of the socially unacceptable; because I identified with them. They were fun and intelligent and I felt accepted.

Sure, I showed love; when it suited me or it was on my timetable. I loved on church days, emails, and some phone calls. We could hang on Friday nights if i really liked you. Maybe. You're welcome. Sometimes I think I loved from a mental perch set up above others, because I was obviously more evolved.

I put up my own walls. Yes, I was pushing some boundaries, but it was really an edgy version of the standard institutional line. Ooh look at me, I'm not wearing a tie and have piercings; and I'm still saved. Simpletons.

I was still concerned with who's in and who's out.

Of course I was slamming the institutional church. It is easy to be negative, and shamefully fun. Like Christianity needed me to be it's bad boy or something. I was actually building walls on two ends; a wall for the institution and a wall for those who were too liberal for my tastes.

It takes a lot of time and effort to keep all of that straight.

I do not claim to be perfect now, but I am more aware of what it means to be a friend and to allow anyone who wants to be there to share in the community. Anyone.

I have made an intentional effort to not engage in the who's in and who's out argument. Unless I'm telling someone that they're in.

Because it is the wrong question. It is a question designed to keep people out of the Kingdom; to elevate ourselves by standing on the laid open carcasses of exclusivity.

Maybe all of those sermons on the great commission have stuck with me. It is still important to me to share this story, this life of hope. I'm thankful that i understand it a little bit better.

Comments

Кто-нибудь знает, что такое

Кто-нибудь знает, что такое квантика?

06 Jun

Holy Bible - Stock Car Racing Edition

I wonder if I can read this while I speed.

28 May

Community in Church

in church, community, relationships, tradition

I've been in church my whole life, but the first community I feel a part of is the small groups of the Edge and Ink, and I can't help but think that this is what Christ really intended for us as the 'church'. Living together, journeying together, helping and loving each other. Not JUST showing up to a service 1 to 4 times a week, but being actively involved with people's lives. It's the earliest form of the church, and even Jesus had his community with the disciples.

I mean, think about it, we're supposed to be salt and light to the world - to make the world a better place and to preserve it from decay - what's the best way to do that other than to be involved with peoples' lives? The biggest impact we have is with the people we choose to befriend and discover God with. I used to be supportive of big churches, but now that I'm involved with a couple small communities, I wonder how much of my Christian life I've missed out on. I'm still not AGAINST large churches, but I think the way they're done (or my experience with them) misses a mark. It removes a lot of things from the walk. For example, accountability, questioning, fellowshipping... I've heard it say during services, "Turn around, shake hands and fellowship with people around you." But can you really "fellowship" with people in the 2 seconds it takes to shake a hand with a stranger? Can you really welcome someone by smiling, ushering them to a seat and then letting them sit, alone in a church to listen to a few songs and hear someone preach some sermon that they may or may not understand?

Yes, yes, I know Jesus preached to the multitudes, but after preaching to those multitudes, do you really think people walked away and said nothing? Or do you think they walked back to their homes, discussing the things they heard this radical "Rabbi" teach? Where do you think the most prominant understandings of his teaching came - while they were listening or on the journey home discussing them (and in 2 instances carrying home leftovers!)

Even the disciples looked to Jesus on more than one occasion and basically said, "I don't understand." And Jesus would sit down and break down the parables' meanings. People say they wish they could've been there for the sermon on the mount, but I'm learning that I would rather have been there around the fire after the sermon was preached and said, "Hey Jesus, you said something like, 'blessed are the poor in spirit,' what exactly did you mean by that. I know what I thought, but can you be more clear?" or "Man, Jesus, did you SEE the face on the Pharisees when you said ! That was hilarious! You really hit it to them. I've heard their teachings all my life, but your words... wow. Can you tell it to me again? I want to make sure I understand it right.

Bringing it back to modern day, which is more important - sitting through a service that may seem foreign to you, or sitting down and trying to understand the teachings of Jesus together? Giving God a few hours of our time on Sunday morning/night/Wednesday, or sharing our lives one with another for more than an hour and a half at a time?

I'm not gonna lie. It's harder. You can't wear your 'church face' the whole time when you spend that extra time with people. You will see ugly things. You will see that the people that appeared "holy" are no different than you. It keeps you humble, human, grounded. There will be disagreements, arguments, offenses.... There will be heart break as one member of the group's heart breaks and you're there for them.Your worst side may be brought out...

But on the flip side to all this, you will feel more comfortable in your humanity and realize that it's not about the 'church face,' but it's okay to be you. You will see beautiful things. You can learn that maybe you're not right about it all - that you don't have all the answers and that that's okay. You will rejoice when others rejoice. Your best side will be brought out... and best of all, you realized that you're not alone. It's easy to walk into a modern day church service and feel alone, but when you're in community, others around you should be able to pick up that burden for you, to make you feel welcome and involved, or comforted, but mostly to know that you're not in this thing alone. We're here to help you. We're here for you.

Jesus understood that. The early Church understood that. Why do you think Paul wrote 3/4 of the New Testament? He was writing to the different communities he had been involved in. That's why he always started or summed up with a list of names of who he wanted to say hi to. Names we skip over. They were people that had probably brought something to Paul's life because they were willing to sit down and earnestly search the scriptures over meals, sharing their lives with him and even in his absence, he knew and felt their part in his life.

Thank you Ink Church and The Edge for teaching me about true community. For being there as I sift through the beliefs that I've had and still have, for journeying with me as I find out that I don't have all the answers, and that it's okay.

27 May

Barrack Obama Bible Cover

I can't believe this is real. It can be found at book stores in the bible cover section.

Sometimes we like to mix our religion with our politics. I recall a similar item during the bush administration. Perhaps the makers bank on people's merging of faith and politics.

Comments

Кто-нибудь знает, что такое

Кто-нибудь знает, что такое квантика?

26 May

Our Own Langauge

Disclaimer: I like to goof on things; even things I do and am a part of.

I've often accused the church of using language at no one else understands. We have phrases, terminology, and inflections that convey meaning to a very small group of people.

Aware of that, we have tried to use different language to convey meaning while accidentally forming a new version of the thing we disapproved. There are words we have forsaken like for example, the word forsaken. Some because just hate using the old language. Others times the old language has a negative meaning for us.

So here is my list of words we intentionally have quit using, and the words we have replaced them with:

We no longer have church services. That sounds like work.
Now we have gatherings.

We used to be in a walk with God. Now we're on a journey

We don't go to church. We are the church and the church is everywhere. We do belong to Communities. Our communities like to serve but we'll probably say that we are engaging something.

The world has been replaced by the culture. Gone are the days of staying away from this ol world. We now recognize that we have to engage the culture.

Sometimes we don't have our own building and we meet wherever we can. There is no church house but that is okay, twe are into creating space for people. Not necessarily a physical place, but a space to communicate.

Since everyone with a bible and a bad haircut have claimed to be called, we like to say we are compelled to do something. I am compelled to start this new community so that we can gather to provide a space to engage the culture and help them in their journey.

Wow that last one was forced.

22 May

My Reconstruction

in Brian McLaren, construction, emergent

I recently saw Brian McLaren at a conference. Among other things he told us that it is time to start constructing. For a long while we have been deconstructing the church. It has been happening weather the one doing the deconstructing was emerging, reading some Calvin, or hanging at a seminary somewhere becoming more confused.

It has been a fun bit. I've been all over the place. At one point I did not think anything was all that different, I just understood it better. Then I was really able to embrace several points of Calvinism. When I could not resolved some of the harsher points I found myself embracing grace and peace. So my personal deconstruction turned out to be a mashup of theologies enhanced by sociology, science, and psychology.

For the better part of my adult life I have been deconstructing the church. I wanted to know what really mattered; what we invented; what the church was really about.

It has largely been a study of language and culture; a blending of theological ideas and real world experiences with a touch of cynicism a lot of coffee. There have been many conversations and ideas. I needed the freedom and permission to move into and out of these ideas. I had to try on some things and decide on what I wanted to keep.

I have not been able to subscribe to one single school of thought. I love that. Some call it indecisive. I say that I refuse to play by those rules.

So, here is the beginning of my reconstruction. Some of the language is old, but has a new definition in my mind.

Disclaimer: many things here are left unsaid either because i have not finished thinking it through or i am not interested in including it here.

God is sovereign.
That simple statement has given me so much freedom. Things that I have questions about like atonement, grace, law, how to live, how to worship, ideas about the rapture, and many much more has so much less pressure when I start with the idea that God gets to do things however he wants to do them. Sure it is simplistic, but subjects need good jumping off points. Saying that God gets to do things his way means that all of the others things I am trying to figure out have an answer. I may not ever understand them all, although i will always try, and this Kingdom of will be there in control and include me.

The Bible is incomplete.
These texts do not tell the whole story. There are references to things we do not understand and cannot know with certainty. It is written to people who understand what is going on around them in a similar we have inside jokes today. Inside jokes only make sense to people in the know. Scripture is similar. Somehow we have to square with that; that everything there is not knowable, but that is okay because God is sovereign. God has e responsibility of our salvation and his Kingdom, not the Bible.

Sin messed up our head.
Sin is bigger than the personal right and wrong checklists we never are able to live by. Sin has also damaged our view of the world and the love of the father. I believe sin exists on a societal level; that sinfulness is so engrained in our lives and our experiences that we cannot actually see it or realize it. We support shady governments and corporations that hurt millions and we are unaware. We are so involved in the sin that we cannot possibly see. We need grace for that. That does not mean we should not behave ourselves; personal behavior is a subject better suited in the Kingdom of God section.

The Kingdom of God.
This Kingdom is big and for everybody. It is a kingdom without walls and it exists right now. In this point of history our job to love, include and help people around us. Kingdom living is the recognition that God loves us, has reconciled us, and our charge is to invite and take care of each other.

These are the ideas I am willing to use use in the reconstruction. Like I said earlier, there is much left unsaid, but these are building blocks. More may be added later. And there is something nice about simple. I could give a scriptural reference for every stanza I write,but would you look it up? Probably not; it would exist as a way to show either my knowledge of scripture or my capability to use a concordance.

So I reconstruct from these ideas. And I reserve the right to change my mind later.

Comments

Sweet

I'm with you on everything but the sin part. In my reconstruction, I'm still not sure how to view sin. I'm not even sure if we're "messed up" - maybe we're exactly how we're intended to be.

Look forward to talking more about this.

I think we may be how we're

I think we may be how we're intended to be, we just don't realize or understand what that means. We have the ability to do the right thing, but we can't see to do it.

There was a time when I was about total depravity. I don't think I'm there; at least not with that definition.

I think we need light to see how we should live; right now we live in some unlit places.

22 May

Finally! A book that is honest about biblical manipulation

in humor

Hey. At least it is a fun approach to manipulating scripture.